Help in 250-500 Words

User Generated

XrivaFnintr

Business Finance

Description

I need this completed by tomorrow evening. Please use recent empirical articles that is suggested by professor. Also review the corrections folder & rubric.
Thanks

Unformatted Attachment Preview

College of Doctoral Studies RES-850 Modified 10 Strategic Points Template Article Citation Point Broad Topic Area Lit Review Problem Statement Research Questions Sample Describe Phenomena (qualitative) or Define Variables/ Hypotheses (quantitative) Methodology & Design Purpose Statement Data Collection Approach Data Analysis Approach Evaluation (Maximum 250-500 words) Description Location (Page #) Course Code RES-850 Class Code RES-850-O500 Criteria riteria Percentage 100.0% Identification of 10 Strategic Points 35.0% Evaluation of the 10 Points 45.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 10.0% Mechanics of Writing 5.0% APA Format 5.0% Total Weightage 100% 10 Strategic Points Quantitative Study Extraction #2 Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Most of the 10 strategic points are either missing or incorrectly identified. An evaluation of the 10 points is not presented. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Required format is rarely followed correctly. No reference page is included. No in-text citations are used. 50.0 Less than Satisfactory (73.00%) Most of the 10 strategic points are present, and some are incorrectly identified. An evaluation of the 10 points is presented, but incomplete or illogical. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Required format elements are missing or incorrect. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Reference page is present. However, in-text citations are inconsistently used. 82Satisfactory (82.00%) All of the 10 strategic points are present, but some are incorrectly identified. An evaluation of the 10 points is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Required format is generally correct. However, errors are present (e.g. font, cover page, margins, and in-text citations). Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented though some errors are present. Good (91.00%) All of the 10 strategic points are present and correctly identified. An evaluation of the 10 points is presented and thorough. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Required format is used, but minor errors are present (e.g. headings and direct quotes). Reference page is present and includes all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. Excellent (100.00%) All of the 10 strategic points are present and correctly identified with meaningful detail provided. An evaluation of the 10 points is thoroughly presented with rich detail. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. The document is correctly formatted. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. Comments Points Earned Course Code RES-850 Class Code RES-850-O500 Criteria riteria Percentage 100.0% Identification of 10 Strategic Points 35.0% Evaluation of the 10 Points 45.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 10.0% Mechanics of Writing 5.0% APA Format 5.0% Total Weightage 100% 10 Strategic Points Quantitative Study Extraction #2 Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Most of the 10 strategic points are either missing or incorrectly identified. An evaluation of the 10 points is not presented. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Required format is rarely followed correctly. No reference page is included. No in-text citations are used. 50.0 Less than Satisfactory (73.00%) Most of the 10 strategic points are present, and some are incorrectly identified. An evaluation of the 10 points is presented, but incomplete or illogical. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Required format elements are missing or incorrect. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Reference page is present. However, in-text citations are inconsistently used. 82Satisfactory (82.00%) All of the 10 strategic points are present, but some are incorrectly identified. An evaluation of the 10 points is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Required format is generally correct. However, errors are present (e.g. font, cover page, margins, and in-text citations). Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented though some errors are present. Good (91.00%) All of the 10 strategic points are present and correctly identified. An evaluation of the 10 points is presented and thorough. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Required format is used, but minor errors are present (e.g. headings and direct quotes). Reference page is present and includes all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. Excellent (100.00%) All of the 10 strategic points are present and correctly identified with meaningful detail provided. An evaluation of the 10 points is thoroughly presented with rich detail. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. The document is correctly formatted. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. Comments Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Answer posted please confirm. If you need anything rectified let me know

Running head: EVALUATION

1

Evaluation
Name
Institutional Affiliation

EVALUATION

2
Evaluation

A literature review can be perceived as a tool that enables a researcher to critically
evaluate a set of sources such as scholarly journal article sources, books, theories and any other
sources aimed at investigating a particular matter/subject. Scholarly journal articles and books
are often used in literature reviews by researchers since they contain empirical evidence and an
in-depth analysis or study of the subject or issue under investigation (Becker et al., 2015). Prior
to carrying out a literature review there, we step that were employed by researchers as
precedence to completing the review. These steps were taken for the selected study and the
primary step being having an inclus...


Anonymous
Just the thing I needed, saved me a lot of time.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags