FIN 571 Week 6 Capital Budgeting Assignment, Part 2

Aug 8th, 2016
Studypool Tutor
University of Phoenix
Price: $40 USD

Tutor description

The executive team of SNC has completed the decision making for capital budgeting for the firm. Now the team must decide which decisions and approach were the best for the company. The executive team must create a presentation to be given to the board members of SNC. Compare the decisions and results of all members of the team. Create a 20-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation that includes detailed speaker notes that act as the script of the presentation in which you include the following: • Summarize the decisions made by each member. • Explain why those decisions were made. • Analyze the effects the team's decisions had on SNC's working capital. • Select one plan from the team's results to propose as the best option for SNC • Defend this option to the board including all supporting documentation. Cite a minimum of three scholarly sources. Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.

Word Count: 1384
Showing Page: 1/20
Capital Budgeting Assignment, Part 2FIN/571Introduction The team is tasked with rendering a decision on aninvestment opportunity where the most optimumapproach is paramount in continuing companysustainability by employing and careful utilization ofNPV, cash flow management, and metrics toenable selecting the most favorable project forinvestment.Summarize the decisions made by each memberChris(APV 629.13)- Focus was placed on Free Cash Flow(FCF) and NPV inmaking choices throughout the simulation. Initial cost, and risk were also afactor. Creating positive cash flow for the company Focus on low cost projects Having positive NPV Ensuring future revenues through acquisitions despite outflow of cashCatina (APV 643.54) Team member Catina yielded the highes APV fromthe team simulations. Her focus each year was based off NPV. Brand recognition was also important for her decisions. Looked to diversifySummarize the decisions made by each memberMichael Focused on a mix of analysis methods to give thecompany room to grow. Early focus on cost, IRR and payback later focus placed on low cost projects to actualize moregains. In the final years, the company reinvested in itself by themeans of upgrades, but also kept an eye of Cost.Terence Focus was placed on tracking capital and monitoringcash flows Closely monitor cash flow for investment projects Used Npv as a foundation for decision making Plac

Review from student

Studypool Student
" Outstanding Job!!!! "
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1829 tutors are online

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors